Well I did go to see the film, at Bradford's National Media Museum*
Er, that's it.
*Recommended, for its three cinemas including IMAX, and free galleries, where there are many interesting exhibitions including changing-content shows and one of very few surviving Wallace & Gromit sets.
++++++++++
Oh all right then, because it's about a walk of the Appalachian Trail (AT).
Is it a good film ? No.
Is it worth seeing ? No, except for the scenery (which gets above the trees enough to be memorable, particularly if you've been on the AT).
Is Redford any good ? No. Well he's better than he often has been, but that's not saying much.
Is Nolte any good ? Yes, it's a good comic turn with a self-aware heart.
Is Thompson any good ? Of course, but she's on screen for less than 10 or 15 minutes.
Why did Redford make it ? It seems to have been originally intended for himself and Paul Newman, possibly directed by Chris Columbus (Harry Potter) or Barry Levinson (Rain Man). After Newman's death it was no doubt put on the back burner, perhaps re-awakening after the success of 'Wild' (Reese Witherspoon on the Pacific Crest Trail, very good IMO).
Is is a realistic portrayal of walking a National Trail ? Not even that. It was filmed on only small parts of the AT (Wikipedia says mainly Georgia), it hardly rains, none of the rucksacks (including those carried by passing extras) are heavy enough - the right size but no more content than day-packs, no blisters, no pack-welts, no hardships (only 25% of through-hikers complete).
Is it faithful to the original book ? No. Not even Redford's age (born 1936) is right - Bryson (born 1951, mid-40s at the time). They do only part of the AT, Bryson and Katz skipped to further north and Bryson later did more. Bryson and Katz didn't have all the film's featured adventures (women, bears, a fall into a ravine). They began with the same lightweight gear as they ended with (Katz discarded lots at the start). Bryson goes on at length about hypothermia and Mt. Washington, neither of which are in the film.
Is it funny ? Yes in a few places, but few of them to do with long-distance walking. The book's much better in that, and many other, regards.
In short, don't bother unless you're a big fan of Redford and like trees (oh and bears - *of course* they don't hang their food up). I'm sure Redford *has* carried a full backpack and knows at least something about doing LDPs - he's very fit, much more than Bryson was at the time. So why make it - the packs and the film - so lightweight ?
The DVD should be out before long - and in a supermarket bin near you soon after that.
Iain.